982 Avatard 2
Debate to end all debates…
Our debate that either Jim or dave (not Dave) mentioned last week was over the Na’vi or Avatar’s having “junk”. I believe dave bet Jim and Bryan that they would not show “Avatar” junk in an uncut version of the film. So it actually turned out to be a debate on whether or not it would be shown versus the idea that they actually have any. For those that have seen the film (or just didn’t play attention), Sigourney Weaver’s character tells Sam Worthington’s character that if he plays with his hair thing too much he’ll go blind. It’s a pretty obvious reference to masturbation. Either way I stopped caring about this and in fact forgot about the whole conversation until we started working on these strips.
Does the Na’vi or Avatars or whatever have junk? Does any one care? Weigh in below.
If you would like to check out the progress of our other site, you can go to http://www.brewerycomic.com and check it out. I think we are aiming for an official launch date of St. Patty’s Day (3/17) for reasons that should not have to be explained here.
-Phil
has way too much to do
March 9th, 2010 at 8:44 am
how can you define who is male and who is female without having junk?! I believe the originally did have it and was cut out to get the PG-13 rating. I believe there will be junk in the directors cut, WAHOOO! Blue junk! just like Watchmen!
March 9th, 2010 at 10:18 am
Maybe it will have junk but not traditional junk. If these things can connect to animals with their hair, then who is to say that we would even recognize what the reproductive organs look like.
March 9th, 2010 at 10:43 am
Eh… I’m going to have to say no junk. Although the chick did have boobs, I don’t believe the males have external genitalia between their legs. The hair is the source for reproduction, so there would be no need for a weiner or a vag. Don’t get me wrong, I would have been just as excited as the next person to see this blue stallion, but I don’t think it’s going to happen bc it doesn’t exist. I know the Na’vi wear clothing covering the “naughty bits” but I just think that’s for the viewers sake, to relate to them as an established human like species, not just blue animals running around. Maybe, just maybe we can see some action in an avatar porn flick– Avatar: I Blue Myself or Pandora’s Box.
PS- I googled Na’vi images to see if I could see anything representing a bulge.. and it’s sad to see how many people morphed themselves into these blue characters. Like REALLY sad. Check it out. Please.
March 9th, 2010 at 11:18 am
According to the Na’vi Wannabe Loons Forum i was reading that they do not reproduce when they attached their tails. That it is an emotional bond, not a reproductive organ “The Avatar: An Activist’s Survival Guide says they reproduce like humans…and in another interview with Cameron, apparently he was quoted saying something along the lines that they’re “Hung like mules”… so we can safely assume they’ve got sexual anatomy similar to our own. (or..terran mammals…) ” and “Activist Guide – P-30
[...]The mechanics of reproduction are similar to that of humans and other Terran mammals[...] [the process of mating, or a Terran equivalent of marriage, marked by the intertwining and connection of queues] is both highly erotic and profoundly spiritual, but does not in itself lead to reproduction.”
March 9th, 2010 at 11:42 am
Answered. Boom.
March 9th, 2010 at 5:57 pm
Na’avi dick meat thread. I thought I’d never see the day. I guess we shall wait like creeps watching for Sir Gaga’s hermie-cock to fall out of the loin cloth. I, for one, will not be hitting pause if I catch this infamous blue meat. Pause.
March 9th, 2010 at 10:58 pm
Happy Hour: Brought to you by the number 7 and the words ‘Na’vi Dick Meat’